On 6/21/2013 10:18 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 11:35 AM, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/21/2013 7:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I get your point, but I'd like the rest of this group to know who these
>>>> two are and what they're about.
>>>>
>>> I'm sure we can figure it out on our own.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> If true, why the safe harbor here then?
> (snipped)
>
> Safe harbor? WTF? I've been on this newsgroup for a very long time.
> Some of the people you are talking about haven't managed or even
> attemped to "kill" this newsgroup.

I agree.

The use it like bin Laden did Afghanistan.

> You don't like the posters?

I like their respective 'talents wrt to bbq and food photography.

I think it'd be peachy if they stuck to that.

> Killfile them.

I've never been much on the head in sand method.

> What you're doing is instigating.

Actually Marty followed ME over here from afb and initiated, not the
other way round.

Sycophantic Spin was all too happy to join in.

> This ng has done pretty well
> for decades without your playing cybercop.

And some others have died for the ministrations of Spin and Marty.

> You want safe? Go to a moderated forum. Flee to Facebook.
>
> Jill

It's funny you mention that, give FB has almost administered the death
knell to usenet.

For a while the moderated yahoo groups seemed to be the replacement, but
I think they've tapered off a bit too.

If you harbor group-killers you as much as legitimize their actions.

There's no way I see you as intending to do that given your posts.