"sf" > wrote in message
news
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d5e8/0d5e805acfc94c50642725418af91348adb90c0e" alt="Stick Out Tongue"
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:28:44 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > Why is everyone so obsessed with dissing Starbucks? Simple solution:
>> > if you don't like it, don't patronize it. I'm not a Starbucks fan,
>> > but people who can't get past the dark roast have TIAD and wouldn't
>> > know good coffee if it walked up and introduced itself to them in
>> > English. I stop drinking coffee when I'm away from the coasts because
>> > the stuff people drink in flyover country is absolutely vile... more
>> > like dirty dishwater than real coffee.
>>
>> Obsessed? Hardly more than a few posts on this thread. Hyperbole does
>> not
>> prove your point. If there is something wrong about sharing ones
>> discoveries and it annoys you then maybe you should find another
>> newsgroup?
>>
>>
> Yes, obsessed. Every single freekin time something coffee related
> comes up all the Julie Boves of the coffee world crawl out of the
> woodwork.
So go have yourself a nice big latte at Starbucks and write the CEO a fan
letter. Adults are allowed opinions and venues such as this are where those
opinions are shared. To chastise somebody for commenting on coffee in the
middle of a thread about coffee is silly. I shared a little known brand
called Montecristo which has very limited distribution and is a well kept
secret in the coffee world. I thought I was doing people who enjoy fine
coffee a flavor. So no apologies.