"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:45:59 -0800, "Pico Rico"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:36:49 -0800, "Pico Rico"
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> "sf" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:05:03 -0800 (PST), Kalmia
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:59:15 AM UTC-5, sf wrote:
>> >> >> > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:06:10 -0800 (PST), Kalmia
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > So, I take it there is NO way to eliminate that one ring?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Why would one matter?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cuz it's one more noise intrusion, esp. if I'm trying to nap, read,
>> >> >> anything which makes ya stop a second and wait for the second ring
>> >> >> or
>> >> >> decide to walk over to the caller id.
>> >> >
>> >> > I suppose you could always turn the sound down when you don't want
>> >> > to
>> >> > be bothered, if one ring is a problem.
>> >>
>> >> he wants to be able to hear the second + rings if it is a legit call.
>> >> duh.
>> >>
>> > Let it go to voice mail.
>>
>>
>> what if that is not his choice?
>>
> Then he has no business complaining about a single ring.

you make no sense at all.