On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:04:35 -0800, "Pico Rico"
> wrote:

>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:45:59 -0800, "Pico Rico"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "sf" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:36:49 -0800, "Pico Rico"
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> "sf" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:05:03 -0800 (PST), Kalmia
> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:59:15 AM UTC-5, sf wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:06:10 -0800 (PST), Kalmia
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > > So, I take it there is NO way to eliminate that one ring?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Why would one matter?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cuz it's one more noise intrusion, esp. if I'm trying to nap, read,
> >> >> >> anything which makes ya stop a second and wait for the second ring
> >> >> >> or
> >> >> >> decide to walk over to the caller id.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I suppose you could always turn the sound down when you don't want
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > be bothered, if one ring is a problem.
> >> >>
> >> >> he wants to be able to hear the second + rings if it is a legit call.
> >> >> duh.
> >> >>
> >> > Let it go to voice mail.
> >>
> >>
> >> what if that is not his choice?
> >>
> > Then he has no business complaining about a single ring.
>
> you make no sense at all.
>

I was thinking the same about you.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.