On Monday, November 25, 2013 1:45:26 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2013-11-24 9:32 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>
> > "sf" > wrote in message
>
> > ...
>
> >> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:36:18 -0800, "Pico Rico"
>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>>
>
> >>> "Booz Allen" > wrote in message
>
> >>> ...
>
> >>>> Chopped Fingers casserole With Chef Giada De Laurentiis
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> http://www.torontosun.com/2013/11/24...ger-on-live-tv
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> gobble gobble
>
> >>>
>
> >>> pass out? stitches? What a wuss.
>
> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> Everything except discussing the cut was edited out by the time I
>
> >> watched it.
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> > I saw before and after pictures. The after picture was a finger with a
>
> > little bandage on it. The before picture showed the cut. Sure, I've cut
>
> > myself like that. Sure, it bled pretty good. (sure I felt stoopid) But
>
> > pass out? Stitches? What a wuss.
>
> >
>
>
>
> The last time I had a nasty cut I should have had stitches but I went to
>
> late. When I showed up the ER after noon the next day the nurse
>
> chastised me for not coming sooner, asking what made me think I didn't
>
> need stitches right away. I told her the truth. I had had two Manhattans
>
> so I could not drive, and I had a leg on lamb on the BBQ and I didn't
>
> want to waste it. I had put a nice tight bandage on it and the bleeding
>
> was under control. The doctor could not stitch it because it was too
>
> late. He put some sort of bandage on it and it healed better and with
>
> less scarring than if I had had stitches.

My wife had some surgery on her neck. They just glued the skin on the 3 inch incision together. I guess they could do that if the area is not under stress. There was no dressing on it either. It was pretty neat, figuratively and literaly.

>
>
>
>
>
> How do you try not to faint? It's not something most people can control.