On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:56:45 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

> Call me elitist, but I really don't think that
> subsidized housing should be located on prime property. People with
> their own money are willing to pay more for it, and poor people are not
> in a position to demand that sort of luxury.
>

I'd be against it too. Not should people only pay more for prime
land... they should be able to pay the increased *taxes* on that land.
Affordable housing is subsidized by tax payers, so it will be a
lose-lose situation to put affordable, aka low cost, housing on prime
land.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.