On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 12:01:18 PM UTC+10, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:19:47 -0800 (PST), Timo wrote:
> >On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:50:44 AM UTC+10, Janet Bostwick wrote:
>
> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/10/he...inds.html?_r=0
> >
> >From the actual study, it's grass-feeding that matters:
> >
> >"We conclude that increasing reliance on pasture and forage-based feeds on dairy farms has considerable potential to improve the FA profile of milk and dairy products. Although both conventional and organic dairies can benefit from grazing and forage-based feeds, it is far more common - and indeed mandatory on certified organic farms in the U.S. - for pasture and forage-based feeds to account for a significant share of a cow's daily DMI."
>
> What drugs are you on... there is no such thing as an organic pasture,
> at least not on planet Earth... the ENTIRE planet, from pole to pole,
> is polluted... there isn't an organic sq millimeter on this planet.

First, it's a quote. Why not email the authors of the paper and ask them what drugs they were on when they wrote the paper?

Second, learn English. "Organic" is not a synonym for "unpolluted". (Here, it is a legal definition. For livestock, the relevant part is access to pasture not treated with "non-organic" products within the last three years. Pollution is allowed.)