On 12/9/2013 7:01 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:19:47 -0800 (PST), Timo >
> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:50:44 AM UTC+10, Janet Bostwick wrote:
>>> On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:42:37 -0500, "Pete C." wrote:
>>>> Janet Bostwick wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/health/yep-or...ilk-2D11712970
>>>
>>>> Other than the title, that's not really what the article states. The
>>>> reality is that "grass fed" is what is important, not "organic". It is
>>>> entirely possibly to have grass fed without being organic and still have
>>>> the same benefit in the fat profile.
>>>
>>>> Read this instead.
>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/10/he...inds.html?_r=0
>>>
>>> Janet US
>>
>>From the actual study, it's grass-feeding that matters:
>>
>> "We conclude that increasing reliance on pasture and forage-based feeds on dairy farms has considerable potential to improve the FA profile of milk and dairy products. Although both conventional and organic dairies can benefit from grazing and forage-based feeds, it is far more common - and indeed mandatory on certified organic farms in the U.S. - for pasture and forage-based feeds to account for a significant share of a cow's daily DMI."
>
> What drugs are you on... there is no such thing as an organic pasture,
> at least not on planet Earth... the ENTIRE planet, from pole to pole,
> is polluted... there isn't an organic sq millimeter on this planet.
>

One correction, for now.

There is some trapped and confined water beneath the poles, water in its
original state.

They're drilling it, so...