On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:47:59 -0800, sf wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:28:17 +0200, ChattyCathy
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:28:39 -0800, sf wrote:
>>
>>
>> > I haven't extolled the virtues of FB, but unlike you, I don't put it
>> > down either.
>>
>> Guess we remember things differently. The last 50-odd times time we
>> 'discussed' the pros and cons of having a FB account you kept telling
>> me how secure it was,
>
> I don't remember claiming security one way or the other.
>
>> how easy it was to set personal preferences and to friend/unfriend
>> people.
>
> Yes, personal preferences are easy. You can see as much or as little of
> any "friend" as you want. There's no reason for me to talk about
> "unfriending", but blocking is certainly easy.
>
>> You also claimed that it was even easier (and so much more convenient)
>> than sites like photobucket/tinypic to upload photos and/or videos to,
>> in order to share these with your family and friends.
>
> It is, just drag it to the box and FB does the rest.
>
>> I
>> was not convinced - and to this day have not 'signed up' - nor will I.
>
> Ask me if I ca I don't. I have not defended FB for any reason other
> than from the shear stupidity of comments like what you just wrote.
>>
>> I see you've changed your tune somewhat - so heaven help anyone who has
>> the audacity to argue with you about the many virtues of Pinterest (or
>> whatever) once you've decided which social network/photo sharing site
>> is the best thing since bubblegum - or not - in your esteemed opinion.
>>
>> Anyway, I'll just go blow "it" out of my ass to forestall any
>> forthcoming requests from you to do so.
>
> Thank you for being proactive about it.

You're welcome.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy