Ping Julie and real help
"Cheri" wrote:
>
>"barbie gee" > wrote in message
ghcrg.pbz...
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:55:32 -0500, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> It doesn't matter if the responses are kind and helpful or
>>>> mean and nasty, so long as it is about her.
>>>
>>> The other annoyance is if they aren't, then they soon do become about
>>> her.
>>
>> she has a habit of "participating" in threads that others have started by
>> replying with nothing of value, but just stating preferences or dislikes
>> of her own or of her family. It's like the old "me too" replies that are
>> dreaded in any electronic discussion boards. No value added, if it's not
>> a voting poll. Nobody cares if "I can't eat that" or "my husband doesn't
>> like that".
>
> I don't dread a "me too" at all, what I dread is when people don't snip for
>relevance and others have to scroll through a wall of text to see the "me
>too." That is annoying as Hell.
The worst offenders are those who don't trim attributions (makes me
wonder what a ******** they live in) and those with all those double
spaced lines (slovenly *******s). Today I decided to only trim the
last post's attribution.
|