"John J" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 1 May 2014 13:33:58 +0100, "Ophelia"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"John J" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Thu, 1 May 2014 12:34:29 +0100, "Ophelia"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"John J" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:09:13 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 01 May 2014 10:39:34 +1000, John J > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 01 May 2014 09:50:15 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >On Thu, 01 May 2014 08:45:19 +1000, John J >
>>>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:36:57 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>>On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:06:08 +1000, John J >
>>>>>>> >>>wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:38:52 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> >On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:29:46 +1000, John J >
>>>>>>> >>>> >wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>> >>On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:46:56 -0500, DreadfulBitch
>>>>>>> >>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>>> >>>On 4/28/2014 10:54 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> Yikes! Butter and Mayo? Now that is overkill!
>>>>>>> >>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>> >>>By whose definition?
>>>>>>> >>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>>> >>The Heart Foundation.
>>>>>>> >>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>> >Oh, those idiots?
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Yes, mainstream doctors, a crazy bunch
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>It's actually laughable how many people here think they know more
>>>>>>> >>>than
>>>>>>> >>>an actual doctors who went to school, got a degree in their field
>>>>>>> >>>and
>>>>>>> >>>conduct research on the subject.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>Yes, it seems dangerous to ignore established medical science and
>>>>>>> >>follow a quack school of medicine. Even if the establishment isn't
>>>>>>> >>always 100% right.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I'm not going to debate you as it would be a pointless exercise.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Just because I don't agree with saturated fats being harmful, it
>>>>>>> >follows that I must also agree with anything that is fringe or from
>>>>>>> >a
>>>>>>> >'quack school of medicine', does it?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I'll tell you what, don't bother replying to me any more if you're
>>>>>>> >going to be a smug little dickhead about something just because you
>>>>>>> >don't agree with it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You call mainstream doctors 'idiots' but when I call your dudes
>>>>>>> 'quacks', you get all offended.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Double standards: check
>>>>>>> Short fuse: check
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh, my! Now you've done it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes Maybe it's a good thing he lives in the Tasmanian hills, away
>>>>> from other people. Reduces the chance he meets someone who dares
>>>>> disagree with him.
>>>>
>>>>I disagree with him sometimes and we are still friends.
>>>
>>> But has he called you a dickhead and a hypocrite and that "you're
>>> lucky we weren't discussing this IRL", just because you disagreed with
>>> His Tasmanian Highness?
>>
>>No, but I have never abused him either.
>
> Neither have I.

I never said you did. I am just saying how I find it.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/