On Sat, 03 May 2014 01:32:05 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

> On 5/3/2014 1:05 AM, sf wrote:
> > On Sat, 03 May 2014 00:22:41 -0400, jmcquown >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/2/2014 11:39 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 1 May 2014 18:37:24 +0100, Janet > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> In article >, says...
> >>>>
> >>>>>> However, Registered Dieticians are properly trained but people calling
> >>>>>> themselves "nutritionists" are usually, if not always quacks and are not
> >>>>>> to be trusted!
> >>>>>> Graham
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's true too. I cringe when people say that they saw a nutritionist.
> >>>>> However, I do know of a good nutritionist. She doesn't so much tell you
> >>>>> specifically what to eat but more looks at the diet you are eating, tells
> >>>>> you what you are lacking in terms of vitamins, minerals, protein, etc., ways
> >>>>> you can change that and perhaps tells you of things you should look at
> >>>>> giving up.
> >>>>
> >>>> Well that's a step up from your pet psychic and that fake fraudster
> >>>> "hair analyst" in the UK whose "scientific" diagnoses you used to cite.
> >>>
> >>> LOL. Pet psychic??
> >>>
> >> Where have you been? LOL
> >>
> > I think it happened in another ng.
> >
> Oh no. The pet psychic was mentioned here. I don't know Julie from any
> other ng.
>
Guess I missed it then. I've see mentions of it by people who saw
something like that elsewhere, but I haven't seen an actual OP like
that authored by her here.


--

Good Food.
Good Friends.
Good Memories.