On 5/11/2014 12:18 PM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 5/11/2014 11:45 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "sf" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Sun, 11 May 2014 11:57:38 +0100, "Ophelia"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Something that really used to confuse me here is your use of the term
>>>>> 'roast' To me a roast is something to be roasted, but I've been here
>>>>> alreadydata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68dd/e68ddc8ac511f8bf72cf18574fec7aa4b5673560" alt="Smile"
>>>>
>>>> Are you talking about when we braise a pot roast? It's a figure of
>>>> speech, like your "pudding", which is something I will never
>>>> understand.
>>>
>>> No, no, it is when you use the term 'roast' for a piece of meat you have
>>> no intention of roasting
I used to get terribly confused when someone
>>> spoke about a roast, then cooked it in a crock pot <g>
>>>
>>>
>> I can understand your confusion. A cut I often cook in the crock pot
>> is called a "chuck roast". But it can also be roasted in the oven. I
>> guess "roast" refers more to the size and cut of the chunk of meat
>> than it does the method of cooking.
>
> For us, 'roast' is a method of cooking.
>
Of course it is. Still, they label some cuts of meat as a "roast".
Pork roast is another example. It's up to you how to prepare it once
you get it home.
Jill