On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 12:16:51 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 21:11:33 -0700 (PDT), "
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Saturday, June 7, 2014 9:11:02 PM UTC-5, Cheryl wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Not at all balanced, but once I ate the chicken I didn't bother with
>> >> sides. I should cook up the spinach I planned on.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Under the foil is a grilled chicken breast that I grilled over direct
>> >> heat for about 7 minutes per side. I tented it to make sure it was
>> >> fully cooked because I didn't want to over cook it on the grill.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The drumsticks were cooked much longer on indirect heat on this infrared
>> >> grill (which I am LOVING) and the skin crisped over direct heat for
>> >> about 5 minutes per side.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This will be good for several meals since I only ate 1/2 of the chicken
>> >> breast and one drumstick. Tomorrow for lunch will be chicken salad on
>> >> lettuce with the rest of the breast.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://i58.tinypic.com/211ukaq.jpg
>> >> http://i57.tinypic.com/ioiyxi.jpg
>> >>
>> >>
>> >Looks scrumptious!
>>
>> I suggest working on presentation.
>
>I would suggest that she doesn't need to when only cooking for
>herself, just as I do. I only care about the taste not the looks.

Sounds like you hold very little value for yourself... one can only
imagine the food you serve yourself makes POW slop look like it could
be served at the Hilton.

More than with all other senses people eat with their eyes.... when
food looks attractive it tastes better too. If I ordered chicken at a
restaurant and it arrived looking like that I'd get up and walk out. I
arrange food more attractively than that when it's left overs I
package for my freezer. I'd arrange that chicken more attractively
were I putting it in a pet bowl to serve my cats on the floor.

I've never seen anything you've cooked, you probably don't, your
larder must consist of pasta you eat cold from the can.