View Single Post
  #526 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Jeßus[_3_] Jeßus[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,676
Default Need French Food Ideas

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 01:37:01 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:38:39 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "sf" > wrote in message
>>>> news >>>> > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:30:14 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Please explain to us all here how *I* could possibly have killed the
>>>> >> topic?
>>>> >
>>>> > You aren't using a real news reader with kill filter capability? How
>>>> > do you filter out posters you don't want to see? Kill this thread by
>>>> > subject. Done. You won't see this thread anymore and they can talk
>>>> > among themselves.
>>>>
>>>> I have no way to kill a thread with my newsreader. At least I don't
>>>> think
>>>> so.
>>>
>>> If you have hidden certain posters, then you also have the ability to
>>> hide threads.
>>>> >
>>>> >> I said several times that she had made her choice. But that didn't
>>>> >> stop
>>>> >> them and they veered off into other things. This happens time and
>>>> >> again
>>>> >> to
>>>> >> me. If I ask a question and I get the answer, then to me it is over.
>>>> >> But
>>>> >> they still keep going on. Days to even weeks afterwards.
>>>> >
>>>> > Set your usenet filters to kill the subject and it won't matter.
>>>> > You're out of it and they are perpetuating the topic with no more
>>>> > input from you.
>>>>
>>>> There is no way to do that. I can only put people or domains in my
>>>> killfile. And no, I am not getting another newsreader. And even if I
>>>> did that, it wouldn't kill anything. They would still keep going on.
>>>
>>> It must. The point is that YOU will not see the topic anymore and you
>>> will stop contributing to it, which is something you seem incapable of
>>> doing at this point.
>>>
>>>> The fact that *I* wouldn't see it is rather meaningless.
>>>
>>> Wrong, it means a lot. It puts the blame about perpetual "Julie"
>>> threads squarely on their shoulders, not yours.
>>>
>>>> They went on all day about
>>>> me and I wasn't anywhere near my computer.
>>>
>>> The beauty of not seeing it is that you don't participate and none of
>>> the blame can be assigned to you.

>>
>> lol are you kidding???? The blame is always assigned to her whether she
>> is here or not))

>
>Agree.


I'm shocked by your unexpected opinion.