"Gary" wrote in message ...


> "Sharon" > wrote:

> > Now there is a cull
> > every so often and the local first nation people are allowed a quota to
> > keep the dear population at a level where they don't starve or wreck
> > residents' landscaping and gardens.

There's a big difference between harvesting deer so there aren't too
many and starve in the winter vs harvesting them because they wreck
your landscaping and gardens. lol!

I've been watching some hunting shows lately. As soon as they kill
some animal, they spout the "politically correct" comments. "I
respect this animal, etc." IMO, if you really respected the animal,
you wouldn't have killed it in the first place. Give me a break! Such
BS!

G.

That's true. Part of the issue was the local Carolinian forest that was
being decimated from the deer population being too large. The culled deer
were consumed by the local First Nation's. The vegetation that was feeding
the deer was greatly diminished. I realize that residential areas have
encroached on the wildlife habitat, but it's a fact and culling is a way of
keeping a healthy deer population in the park. Sharon