ImStillMags wrote:

> Legally the decision is a dangerous precedent and severe misreading
> of the constitution. Medically it entirely misses the fact that
> contraceptives serve many more medical purposes than just preventing
> pregnancy. But theologically it is an even graver misstep. It allows
> no room for grace, it is coercive (the opposite of the example of
> Christ), and it is restrictive. None of those things reflect the vow
> I took on at baptism to "respect the dignity of every human being."
> Today's ruling disregards the dignity of the individual to chose
> their own path in favor of the wealthy and secure, that is a loss for
> us all.
>
> http://www.barefoottheology.com/2014...good-theology/

Good for you - I agree with you 100%.

-S-