In article >,
"Steve Freides" > wrote:

> ImStillMags wrote:
>
> > Legally the decision is a dangerous precedent and severe misreading
> > of the constitution. Medically it entirely misses the fact that
> > contraceptives serve many more medical purposes than just preventing
> > pregnancy. But theologically it is an even graver misstep. It allows
> > no room for grace, it is coercive (the opposite of the example of
> > Christ), and it is restrictive. None of those things reflect the vow
> > I took on at baptism to "respect the dignity of every human being."
> > Today's ruling disregards the dignity of the individual to chose
> > their own path in favor of the wealthy and secure, that is a loss for
> > us all.
> >
> > http://www.barefoottheology.com/2014...good-theology/
>
> Good for you - I agree with you 100%.
>
> -S-

I think we can all agree that food is even more vital to our health than
is birth control. After all this is R.F.C. Why isn't it free with no
co-pay or deductible?