On 7/3/2014 1:03 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 7/3/2014 12:54 PM, DreadfulBitch wrote:
>> On 7/3/2014 1:44 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On 7/2/2014 10:08 PM, DreadfulBitch wrote:
>>>> On 7/2/2014 8:05 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Alan Holbrook" > wrote in message
>>>>> . 30...
>>>>
>>>>>> You want free birth control? Hang a picture of Nancy Pelosi in your
>>>>>> bedroom.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, thank you for that! I just looked up her image as I didn't know
>>>>> who she was. I was going to eat soon. Was...
>>>>
>>>> That's absurd, Julie! First because I can't believe you don't know who
>>>> Nancy Pelosi is. Second Nancy Pelosi is an attractive woman who's been
>>>> photographed many times, frequently in some not-so-flattering poses.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This certainly does not make my horny
>>> http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...-be-Disruptors
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> One of her not-so-flattering poses.
>>
>
> It's interesting how they do this. She looks fine and appropriate in
> videos but a lot of those pictures of her really suck. That's the
> schtick the news services and a lot of the public have become attached
> to. I find it boring and repulsive to make fun of a person's appearance
> and firmly reject all that BS because I am totally awesome!

They also did this a lot to GW so evidently, we're a nation of malicious
retards. Them thars the breaks.