On 7/4/2014 11:11 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 7/3/2014 11:46 PM, Sky wrote:

>>> More than likely - "it" will claim to be allergic to spoons for whatever
>>> reasons! Regardless, "it" will provide all too many excuses why "it"
>>> cannot, and will not!, make use of any suggestions its provided here
>>> (usenet) to answer its questions. It's too fun to provide the troll its
>>> fodder just to see/read its idiotic excuses.
>>>
>>> Sky
>>>
>> You completely ignored the fact that it was *sf* who said she couldn't
>> find a link, not Julie. Nor was Julie the one asking about the
>> preparation method. Sheesh.
>
> She never mentioned Julie you know, you just assumed she was.

In this instance I *know* I was correct. It was quite obvious because
of what she said. That, and the fact she keeps referring to Julie as "it".

> She gets
> so excited when she thinks she can tear someone down she can't even read
> properly.
>
Obviously she can't resist finding some way to bash Julie even though
Julie is the one who said the dish sounds simple enough to make. Sky
jumped on Steve's keywords "spoon fed". She's the one who made the
assumption.

Jill