On 7/6/2014 9:41 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2014 17:58:29 -0700, sf > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 09:13:16 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>> As with most any other country. Not sure why the Philippines shouldn't
>>> have kangaroo <shrug>.
>>
>> Get over yourself. My point is, unlike your situation, it's not on
>> the common person's dinner table. Maybe they serve it to rich Asian
>> tourists, but I've never heard any Filipino talk about eating kangaroo
>> in the PI.
>
> No. That's wasn't your point at all. You said you thought Travis had
> been duped, which implies you think something other than kangaroo had
> been served up to him.
>
> Again you try to move the goal posts, it's quite a habit of yours.
>
Except Travis responded to sf:

They did "themes" from time to time, and the kangaroo was available
during "Australian Month". They actually had a large inflated kangaroo
at the entrance to the restaurant for the month. Kangaroo was not
normally on the menu, so I expect that it was authentic, brought in just
for that month's theme.

Now, I understand you're saying why couldn't they have it in the
Phillipines? But apparently, at least at this one hotel where Travis
stayed, it was not a regular thing.

Jill
Jill