"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 7/7/2014 11:17 AM, sf wrote:
>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 17:23:25 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "sf" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> I don't know about Royal Watchers, but we have enough celebrity
>>>> watchers over here to support all of those magazines at the grocery
>>>> store checkout stands and the Royal Family has celebrity status over
>>>> here.
>>>
>>> I suppose to some they must, but then I am not at all interested in
>>> celebrities either, unless they're in a good movie, or singing a good
>>> song.
>>>
>> So you and I are exceptions. Let's say all of the active posters in
>> rfc have our attitude. Our disinterest doesn't matter because there
>> are a whole lot more people who are interested and purchase enough of
>> those magazines that they are still a grocery store checkout aisle
>> staple.
>>
> I'm an exception, too. I've never bought one of those tabloid rags and
> never will. But yes, *someone* is buying them.

Must be, there are loads of magazines with 'celebs' on the cover. They
wouldn't print them if they didn't sell.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/