"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 17:23:25 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> > I don't know about Royal Watchers, but we have enough celebrity
>> > watchers over here to support all of those magazines at the grocery
>> > store checkout stands and the Royal Family has celebrity status over
>> > here.
>>
>> I suppose to some they must, but then I am not at all interested in
>> celebrities either, unless they're in a good movie, or singing a good
>> song.
>>
> So you and I are exceptions. Let's say all of the active posters in
> rfc have our attitude. Our disinterest doesn't matter because there
> are a whole lot more people who are interested and purchase enough of
> those magazines that they are still a grocery store checkout aisle
> staple.

I buy the magazines. I didn't used to. I don't buy them because I am
interested. But I noticed that Angela was reading them. She hates to read.
So I figured that anything she would read was good. I do flip through them.
Mainly look at the pictures but don't know who most of the people in the
pictures are.

I also think all of they bogus reporting is funny. She's pregnant! She's
not pregnant! It's twin girls. It's a boy! All the same week, all the
same person.