On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:53:19 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:03:48 AM UTC-10, Je�us wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:01:40 -1000, dsi1
>>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 8/5/2014 3:39 PM, Usenet Support Personnel wrote:
>>
>> >> On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:21:04 -1000, dsi1 wrote:
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>> On 8/5/2014 3:10 PM, Janet Wilder wrote:
>>
>> >>>> On 8/5/2014 8:00 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>
>> >>>
>>
>> >>>>> The NNTP servers still transfer data like it's 1999. :-)
>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>> Never been a problem for me. I don't do binaries.
>>
>> >>>
>>
>> >>> The low data throughput of this old protocol is pretty amazing in this
>>
>> >>> age of 20Mbps+ speeds.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> There you go throwing around those buzzwords that you don't have a
>>
>> >> clue WTF they mean nor how they relate to the Real World.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> The transmission protocol here is TCP/IP. The same as it is for
>>
>> >> practically every other protocol that connects you to your ISP and an
>>
>> >> eventual server. Your Usenet download/upload speed is limited by the
>>
>> >> exact same variables that affect transmission of web pages, email, or
>>
>> >> file transfers to/from your computer.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >
>>
>> >And this affects me how? :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> Once again, somebody points out and explains how and why you're wrong
>>
>> about something - and your only response is some flippant remark. You
>>
>> have a real habit of doing that. I don't know what is so difficult
>>
>> about accepting you're wrong, everyone is wrong sometimes. Doesnt say
>>
>> a lot about your credibility.
>
>I can dig what you're saying - this should concern me why? :-)

Because your comments about the 'old protocol' of Usenet was
erroneous.