On 8/11/2014 10:49 AM, sf wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:30:08 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> > wrote:
>
>> On Monday, August 11, 2014 10:39:35 AM UTC-5, sf wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 06:02:13 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Do you understand the difference between 'opiates" and opiate antagonists?
>>>
>>>> Apparently not.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I know enough to know that meds like Suboxone are scary stuff and
>>>
>>> something to stay as far away from as possible. I also know that if
>>>
>>> you're using them, you are most certainly "dependent" (a nice term
>>>
>>> that's used when people don't want to hear the word "addicted"). Talk
>>>
>>> to the hand if you think they are the easy answer, because they
>>>
>>> aren't. Watch the dosage increase as your tolerance builds.
>>
>> You don't have more than half a clue, which is why you're sounding like
>> a halfwit. Suboxone does *contain* naltrexone, an opiate antagonist, but
>> it also has an opioid component. Suboxone is not indicated for treating
>> alcohol use disorder, naltrexone is.
>>
>>> If you're taking them, you're better off in a 30 day residential program
>>>
>>> ASAP. If you're not taking them, don't start. They are a problem,
>>>
>>> not a solution.
>>>
>> Anyone who put me in a cage would be playing roulette with their very life.
>>
>> It's old wives whose minds are too ossified to change that led me to bring
>> up the subject in the first place. I know you can read...
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclai...inclair_Method
>>
>> --Bryan
>
> Okay, I get it Bryan. You're taking that stuff and you're doing what
> addicts do. You're in denial. I really don't care. I don't know
> you, you're not a relative and I have no stake in your continued
> existence. Go ahead and destroy your life, but don't come here trying
> to claim what you're doing is good when I know it isn't.
>
>
Look at it this way, if it takes hold and he loses some of the anger
there could be an upside to it.