On 8/12/2014 11:54 AM, ImStillMags wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:43:37 AM UTC-7, Mayo wrote:
>> On 8/12/2014 11:08 AM, ImStillMags wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:28:27 AM UTC-7, Mayo wrote:
>>
>>>> On 8/12/2014 10:10 AM, ImStillMags wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> http://blog.skytruth.org/2014/08/lan...ley-spill.html
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> move the line in the picture to see what is happening.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Yes, and?
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Does that form the lone outcome for ALL other mine tailings ponds?
>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>> http://corpethics.org/article.php?id=2659
>>
>>>
>>
>> These anecdotes do NOT comprise the soul outcome for ALL tailing ponds.
>>
>>
>>
>> You know that, but you will not accept it.
>
>
>
>
> And you seem to be able to accept that even one is unacceptable.

Oh yes, I certainly am.

I accept that man will always make mistakes, fail, screw up, etc.

Airplanes crash, ships sink, sinkholes open up and swallow homes whole,
lightning strikes golfers inside a shelter, your auntie chokes to death
on a pretzel - I do accept that accidents always have and always will
happen.

That's why we have laws, regulatory agencies, oversight, courts, etc.

You're so enmeshed in your own polar extremism that you'd literally shut
down all mining and mineral development because human nature is not perfect.

That type of mentality is why intractable enviros inspire such
frustration and enmity.

I'm not going to let you nor your ilk turn this into a Luddite spiral
downward where we all sit around the last beeswax candle and ponder why
there's no bread on the shelves or lightbulbs that turn on anymore.

Understand?