View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Paul M. Cook Paul M. Cook is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,744
Default Salmon disaster redux


"ImStillMags" > wrote in message
...
> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:13:27 PM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "ImStillMags" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:38:06 AM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:

>>
>> >> If you aren't a PR rep for the mining inudustry you are in the wrong

>>
>> >>

>>
>> >> business.

>>
>> >>

>>
>> >

>>
>> > I was about to ask if he was employed as a propagandist for the
>> > industry,

>>
>> > you beat me to the thought.

>>
>>
>>
>> He's good, I'll give him that.
>>

>
>
> The one thing he fails to address in all the information he cites is that
> where does the funding come from? Follow the money. Who does it
> benefit, this so solid sounding information? Too much disinformation
> floating around out there.


I would imagine that to properly build, line and then recover a 580 acre
tailing pond 100 feet deep in toxic sludge would require more money than the
mining project could ever produce. It is like "clean coal" technology the
coal industry spouts. It simply does not exist.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com