On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 2:24:54 PM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "ImStillMags" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:13:27 PM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
> >> "ImStillMags" > wrote in message
>
> >>
>
> >> ...
>
> >>
>
> >> > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:38:06 AM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
> >> >> If you aren't a PR rep for the mining inudustry you are in the wrong business.

> >> > I was about to ask if he was employed as a propagandist for the
>
> >> > industry, you beat me to the thought. e's good, I'll give him that.
>
> > The one thing he fails to address in all the information he cites is that
>
> > where does the funding come from? Follow the money. Who does it
>
> > benefit, this so solid sounding information? Too much disinformation
>
> > floating around out there.

> I would imagine that to properly build, line and then recover a 580 acre
>
> tailing pond 100 feet deep in toxic sludge would require more money than the
>
> mining project could ever produce. It is like "clean coal" technology the
>
> coal industry spouts. It simply does not exist.
>

Just a quick "thank you" for the intelligent debunking posts. Mayo's ilk flourished and continue to flourish, backed by such reactionary funding sources as the Marshall Institute and others.

Their job is to hire scientific whores to create doubt in the (usually) uninformed public mind, despite the overwhelming concensus of legitimate scientists w/o an axe to grind.

These scientific whores did a number on acid rain, tobacco dangers, ozone hole,
climate change. Now that all have been demonstrated to be true, they are working on fracking while continuing to create doubt about alternative energy.

As you wrote: Follow the money. (From Judge Sirica of Watergate fame.)

HB