On 8/12/2014 3:24 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "ImStillMags" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:13:27 PM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>> "ImStillMags" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:38:06 AM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>
>>>>> If you aren't a PR rep for the mining inudustry you are in the wrong
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> business.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> I was about to ask if he was employed as a propagandist for the
>>>> industry,
>>>
>>>> you beat me to the thought.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> He's good, I'll give him that.
>>>
>>
>>
>> The one thing he fails to address in all the information he cites is that
>> where does the funding come from? Follow the money. Who does it
>> benefit, this so solid sounding information? Too much disinformation
>> floating around out there.
>
> I would imagine that to properly build, line and then recover a 580 acre
> tailing pond 100 feet deep in toxic sludge would require more money than the
> mining project could ever produce.

And once again you let your "imagination" lead you to conclusions devoid
of fact.

> It is like "clean coal" technology the
> coal industry spouts. It simply does not exist.

That's another lie.

It existed as early as the mid 1930s in Germany - the Fischer/Tropsch
process.

Honestly, do you ever get tired of disseminating disinformation?