On 8/12/2014 4:37 PM, Hypatia Nachshon wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 2:24:54 PM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "ImStillMags" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:13:27 PM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>
>>>> "ImStillMags" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> ...
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:38:06 AM UTC-7, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>
>>>>>> If you aren't a PR rep for the mining inudustry you are in the wrong business.
>
>>>>> I was about to ask if he was employed as a propagandist for the
>>
>>>>> industry, you beat me to the thought. e's good, I'll give him that.
>>
>>> The one thing he fails to address in all the information he cites is that
>>
>>> where does the funding come from? Follow the money. Who does it
>>
>>> benefit, this so solid sounding information? Too much disinformation
>>
>>> floating around out there.
>
>> I would imagine that to properly build, line and then recover a 580 acre
>>
>> tailing pond 100 feet deep in toxic sludge would require more money than the
>>
>> mining project could ever produce. It is like "clean coal" technology the
>>
>> coal industry spouts. It simply does not exist.
>>
>
> Just a quick "thank you" for the intelligent debunking posts.

The ones devoid of factual data?

It is laughable you'd buy opinion over truth.

> Mayo's ilk flourished and continue to flourish, backed by such reactionary funding sources as the Marshall Institute and others.

Sorry my dear, I have no "funding source".

And do you think the Sierra Club or Greenpeace are any less "reactionary"?

Rhetorical question, I know...

> Their job is to hire scientific whores to create doubt in the (usually) uninformed public mind, despite the overwhelming concensus of legitimate scientists w/o an axe to grind.

The peer review herd?

Yes well, barking in unison for grants is no less corrupt than letting
Exxon pay for play.

> These scientific whores did a number on acid rain, tobacco dangers, ozone hole,
> climate change.

Oh look, all grouped together...apples, oranges, and pomegranates...

> Now that all have been demonstrated to be true, they are working on fracking while continuing to create doubt about alternative energy.

Fracking, the latest whipping post, sigh...

> As you wrote: Follow the money. (From Judge Sirica of Watergate fame.)
>
> HB

And why not a dash of Watergate too while you're at it!

Any more witlessly displaced sanctimony to splatter us with?