On 9/2/2014 12:33 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Mayo" > wrote in message ...
>> On 9/1/2014 11:06 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>> "Mayo" > wrote in message ...
>>>> On 9/1/2014 7:38 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>> OK,. you get an A for your Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, book report.
>>>>
>>>> And you get an A+ for shooting from the rhetorical hip and being unable
>>>> to
>>>> support and prove your points.
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>
>>> The problem with the ostrich position is it leaves your backside in a
>>> vulnerable state.
>>
>> The problem with shooting from the hip is you constantly miss the target.
>>
>>> Not my fault you seem to be completely disconnected from the world around
>>> you. There is only one thing that explains this and that is that you
>>> never
>>> have had to think outside of the box you live in.
>>
>> Not my problem that you trade in heavily emotionally loaded fantasies,
>> ones that collapse under the lens of reality.
>
> Oooohhhhhhhhh emotionally loaded!

Precisely, your rhetoric trades in emotive negativity and misconceived
notions.

> I work in the realk world.

How on earth do you manage?

Your dogma is so fatally decoupled from reality that you must be in a
constant state of flux.

> You work for mum and dad apparently.

I'd briefly counsel you that in a boomer-heavy medium that would be a
bit of a logical improbability at best, chronologically speaking.

>>> Your urbanity is based on disinterest and your disinterest is based on
>>> privilege.
>>
>> LOL!
>
>> It has been my privilege to expose your unending torrent of lies,
>> misrepresentations, and outright hyperbole.
>
> Just where have you done that save to post a link to somebody's blog?

Right the way through this thread, again and again.

Tell us once more how the unions made contractual concessions to GM
before the bailout.

>> Let's hear that sad canard again about how the union conceded to GM before
>> the bailout, you lying turdbucket.
>
> Look who's emotrional.

Look who's a rank liar.

You were caught, brought up short with am indisputable news link, yet
still maintain your mulish mendacity.

In a word - you're sick.

> See the problem is you believe too much in yourself.

I didn't cite myself, I cited valid and proven resources.

You, otoh, have cited ONLY yourself.

> Your dogma was run over by my karma and now you grieve.

Your karma is to be rebuked.

If I did so in a dogmatic fashion it was entirely proportionate to the
flighty disinformation you so flagrantly tendered here.

> Have a cookie. Mum just baked them.

What, and risk eating GMO?!?!?

Sorry, I'll have to get a permission slip from Monsanto.