"Mayo" > wrote in message ...
> On 9/2/2014 12:33 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "Mayo" > wrote in message ...
>>> On 9/1/2014 11:06 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>> "Mayo" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 9/1/2014 7:38 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>> OK,. you get an A for your Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, book report.
>>>>>
>>>>> And you get an A+ for shooting from the rhetorical hip and being
>>>>> unable
>>>>> to
>>>>> support and prove your points.
>>>>>
>>>>> Done.
>>>>
>>>> The problem with the ostrich position is it leaves your backside in a
>>>> vulnerable state.
>>>
>>> The problem with shooting from the hip is you constantly miss the
>>> target.
>>>
>>>> Not my fault you seem to be completely disconnected from the world
>>>> around
>>>> you. There is only one thing that explains this and that is that you
>>>> never
>>>> have had to think outside of the box you live in.
>>>
>>> Not my problem that you trade in heavily emotionally loaded fantasies,
>>> ones that collapse under the lens of reality.
>>
>> Oooohhhhhhhhh emotionally loaded!
>
> Precisely, your rhetoric trades in emotive negativity and misconceived
> notions.
>
>> I work in the realk world.
>
> How on earth do you manage?
>
> Your dogma is so fatally decoupled from reality that you must be in a
> constant state of flux.
>
>> You work for mum and dad apparently.
>
> I'd briefly counsel you that in a boomer-heavy medium that would be a bit
> of a logical improbability at best, chronologically speaking.

Doesn't mean it doesn't include you.

>>>> Your urbanity is based on disinterest and your disinterest is based on
>>>> privilege.
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>
>>> It has been my privilege to expose your unending torrent of lies,
>>> misrepresentations, and outright hyperbole.
>>
>> Just where have you done that save to post a link to somebody's blog?
>
> Right the way through this thread, again and again.

Sure, sure. Your opinion is admissible in a court of law is what you'll
tell me next.

> Tell us once more how the unions made contractual concessions to GM before
> the bailout.
>
>>> Let's hear that sad canard again about how the union conceded to GM
>>> before
>>> the bailout, you lying turdbucket.
>>
>> Look who's emotrional.
>
> Look who's a rank liar.
>

A lie is a deliberate miscoinstruction of the truth in order to deceive.
Just because you do not read the same material I do does not make me a liar.
You argue like brain dead republicans. What are your thoughts on climate
change? How old is the Earth? Will gays burn in eternal hell?

> You were caught, brought up short with am indisputable news link, yet
> still maintain your mulish mendacity.

A blog is not a news link. A bloig is a blog. An op-ed is not news either.

> In a word - you're sick.

Oh my. That hurts.

>> See the problem is you believe too much in yourself.
>
> I didn't cite myself, I cited valid and proven resources.

No, you did not. You merely posted links to somebody's opinion which
supports your opinion. Yoiu just think your opinion is cold hard fact.
Because .. well because you believe it ... that's why.

> You, otoh, have cited ONLY yourself.
>
>> Your dogma was run over by my karma and now you grieve.
>
> Your karma is to be rebuked.

My karma is in the shop getting the dents pulled out after sending your
dogma to the ages.

> If I did so in a dogmatic fashion it was entirely proportionate to the
> flighty disinformation you so flagrantly tendered here.
>
>> Have a cookie. Mum just baked them.
>
> What, and risk eating GMO?!?!?

It's good for you. I ahve somebody's opinion on that. Take it to the bank.

> Sorry, I'll have to get a permission slip from Monsanto.

No just read the license agreement on the bag of flour. That's all they
ask.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com