Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>sf wrote:
>
>> Saving tables for large groups is stupid when it's busy. We went to a
>> restaurant *early* only to find they had no open tables because it had
>> just rained and their patio wasn't seating people. Hubby did a quick
>> walk through the restaurant and saw they had a table reserved for the
>> same size as our party. He asked what time the reservation was for -
>> it was an hour into the future, so he asked them to seat us there.
>> The bargain was that we'd be out by the reservation time, which wasn't
>> hard to do with two 3 YOs and a 10 month old. We said YES and we were
>> out of there well under the wire.
>>
>>
>
>I've not been here yet, but it looks like they will kick your ass out if
>you take too long.
>
>The reviews on Yelp are mixed. I do want to try it though, it has just
>not fit time wise when we are in Worcester.
>
>http://www.rosalinaskitchen.com/inde..._6_Dinner-Menu
>Just a friendly reminder of our seating policy at Rosalina's.
>
>For parties of four people or less, please adhere to the
>
>max seating time of 1 1/2 hours.
>
>For parties greater than four people, please adhere to the
>
>max seating time of 2 hours.

I wouldn't eat there... decent restaurants actually encourage patrons
to stay as long as they want so long as they are ordering food, and
especially drink... bar bills generate the most profit, far, FAR more
than food... often food generates little to no profit due to
spoilage... without a booze license most restaurants fail, and booze
doesn't spoil.