On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 20:52:38 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

> On 2014-11-06 20:22, sf wrote:
>
> >>> How common is this? I've NEVER heard anyone say it was otherwise.
> >>> Why else would they have "sugarless" diet tonic?
> >>
> >> Never? Come now. It was discussed here before when someone said they
> >> opted for tonic because it is low in sugar.
> >>
> > Oh, was that Julie? Believe it or not, I don't hang on her every word
> > the way you and a couple of other posters seem to.
>
> Actually, I don't think it was Julie.
> >>
> >>>> FWIW, there is, or used to be, diet tonic water on the market. I don't
> >>>> care for diet pops, and I found diet tonic especially unacceptable.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> So what? You don't make a G&T with tap water.
> >>
> >>
> >> WTF is that supposed to mean? Try some diet tonic sometime and see if
> >> make you any more sour or bitter than you already seem to be.
> >>
> > You don't want sugar and don't diet tonic, too bad for you because
> > there aren't any other choices if you want a G&T.
> >
>
> I have no idea WTF you are talking about. I said that my wife used to
> get diet tonic water and I thought it was disgusting. I like gin and
> tonic. But feel free to jump to some other bizarre conclusion.
>
I think whatever it is you're complaining about is stupid.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.