On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:57:42 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 07:33:42 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 12:34:53 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>>
>>>Christopher Helms wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I suspect a lot of people wouldn't have voted the way they did if they had realized what they were actually voting for.
>>>
>>>Good grief~ So are you saying that those that didn't vote your way
>>>are all idiots? Sure sounds like it. You must be a liberal Dem.
>>
>>Rep - Dem
>>Coke - Pepsi
>>Ford - Chev
>>
>>Pick your team. The other team is stoopid!
>>AKA...
>>Same shit, different lable.
>
>Yes, the political parties today are bad and worse. In our election
>for governor, the exit polls told the truth. Most everyone they spoke
>to said they voted for the guy they disliked less.
>
>As for the ballot questions, many are phrased in such a way that you
>have to answer yes to mean no or no to mean yes
>
>Do you want to stop the discontinuance of aiding terrorist
>organizations?

I know what you mean, we have the occasional referendum here, and the
questions are frequently like that. One time I refused to vote because
of it. There was one question where answering either yes or no really
meant yes in both cases.