"Melba's Jammin'" > wrote in message
news:2014121820333216260-barbschaller@earthlinknet...
> On 2014-12-19 01:30:10 +0000, Sqwertz said:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:39:53 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:25:45 -0800 (PST), Nancy2
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Barb, with all due respect, "2 cups wild rice, cooked," means (as
>>>> written) 2 cups of raw
>>>> Wild rice, then cooked. It is not written correctly, based on the
>>>> proportions of the other
>>>> ingredients. It should have been written,"2 cups cooked wild rice."
>>>>
>>>> But I guess I am late to the discussion...I was out in my canoe, trying
>>>> to find some wild
>>>> rice to harvest. ?
>>>>
>>>> N.
>>>
>>> ALL of the recipes in the literature included with my wild rice say
>>> "UNcooked" wild rice, especially for soups... only recipe that says
>>> cooked wild rice is for a meat loaf recipe. Schaller is another one
>>> who has no clue what a comma means, she must have graduated from the
>>> same *junior* high school as the dwarf.
>>
>> Earlier in the thread you were arguing that it meant cooked wild rice:
>>
>> "2 cups COOKED wild rice" means exactly the same as "2 cups wild rice,
>> cooked".
>>
>> And now here you are trying to take pot shots at Barb who was AGREEING
>> with you, yet now you're trying to change your stance saying it means
>> uncooked wild rice. Make up your feeble little mind, will ya?
>
> Jesus, where was I agreeing with Sheldon? "2 cups wild rice, cooked"
> means you measure 2 cups of raw rice then cook it. I'll have to see if I
> can find what I said that has you and Nancy thinking I agree with Sheldon.
> Mmmmm, not so much.

No matter which side of the fence you are on, you are agreeing with him
because he said one thing first then another.