On 2014-12-19 02:48:09 +0000, Sqwertz said:

> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:33:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin' wrote:
>
>> On 2014-12-19 01:30:10 +0000, Sqwertz said:
>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:39:53 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:25:45 -0800 (PST), Nancy2
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Barb, with all due respect, "2 cups wild rice, cooked," means (as
>>>>> written) 2 cups of raw
>>>>> Wild rice, then cooked. It is not written correctly, based on the
>>>>> proportions of the other
>>>>> ingredients. It should have been written,"2 cups cooked wild rice."
>>>>>
>>>>> But I guess I am late to the discussion...I was out in my canoe, trying
>>>>> to find some wild
>>>>> rice to harvest. ?
>>>>>
>>>>> N.
>>>>
>>>> ALL of the recipes in the literature included with my wild rice say
>>>> "UNcooked" wild rice, especially for soups... only recipe that says
>>>> cooked wild rice is for a meat loaf recipe. Schaller is another one
>>>> who has no clue what a comma means, she must have graduated from the
>>>> same *junior* high school as the dwarf.
>>>
>>> Earlier in the thread you were arguing that it meant cooked wild rice:
>>>
>>> "2 cups COOKED wild rice" means exactly the same as "2 cups wild rice,
>>> cooked".
>>>
>>> And now here you are trying to take pot shots at Barb who was AGREEING
>>> with you, yet now you're trying to change your stance saying it means
>>> uncooked wild rice. Make up your feeble little mind, will ya?
>>
>> Jesus, where was I agreeing with Sheldon? "2 cups wild rice, cooked"
>> means you measure 2 cups of raw rice then cook it. I'll have to see
>> if I can find what I said that has you and Nancy thinking I agree with
>> Sheldon. Mmmmm, not so much.
>
> You said:
>
> "Two cups of cooked wild rice. Maybe 3/4 cup raw."
>
> OK, so Sheldon and that other idiot from Oregon are the only ones that
> disagree now. Now the Earth is back in the correct orbit.
>
> -sw

Thanks. (A little ****y, are we?)
--
--
Barb
www.barbschaller.com, last update April 2013