"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 1/8/2015 9:53 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 9:17:28 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 13:32:05 -0800, "Julie Bove"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> snip
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a lot of sick people here. Maybe Cindy is a woman
>>>>> pedophile.
>>>>> Otherwise why would she fixate on such things? I had nothing indecent
>>>>> there,
>>
>> It doesn't have to be indecent. Someone who is so inclined
>> can fill in the details himself, once you've proved the
>> broad outline of a target.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
> Cindy, you're beating your head against a brick wall. That's gotta hurt!
>
> Fact: People who prey on children or teens (her daughter is a teenager
> now) don't have to see "indecent" pictures in order to have their interest
> piqued. Kids can become targets simply by walking down the street and
> being spotted by someone of that ilk. Having all that info at their
> fingertips just makes things SOOOOO much easier for them.
>
> It would take about what, 3-5 minutes for her to log into her Frontier
> account, click on Contact Us and write an email saying "please delete my
> old Verizon web site". She won't bother because she doesn't grasp why
> anyone is concerned.

And that's not how it works, Jill. ISP's don't do that. But you've never
had a website, have you? I don't really care to hear facts about sickos.
People will do what they will regardless of what I did or didn't do.
Talking like that you sound like you would blame a rape victim for something
he/she said or did or didn't do or wore or...

And if someone wants a pic of a kid, there are so many out there on an every
day basis, they certainly wouldn't need to be looking mine up. Just look in
your mailbox. All those catalogs and ads! Perhaps you should track down
the parents of those kids and give them the same warning if you are so
concerned.