What's wrong with rfc
On 2015-02-20 23:11:48 +0000, notbob said:
> Seems like the few remaining regulars are no longer interested in
> cooking.
What I think is wrong with rfc is that all the substantive exchanges
seem to come buried in topics with wholly misleading names.
"Yesterday's Spaghetti" has a discussion of growing your own herbs,
which herbs shouldn't never be used in spaghetti (you idiot), and off
to other pastas, other idiots, mechancially de-seeding olives and
finishing with competing olive tapenade recipes.
Similarly there may be great discussions inside "Squash Biscuit", "OT:
Walmart" or "Julie Sux". Even higher likelihood it is a spat between
any number of combatants sounding curiously similar to the last 12
spats among them.
So, as a culinary metaphor, the problem is like being forced to eat the
entire chicken, bones and wings and head, if you want to get to the
good part.
Damn you Usenet! Damn you!
--
Food good! Fire BAD!! - Frankenstein's Monster
|