On Mon, 25 May 2015 08:13:34 -0500, Becca EmaNymton
> wrote:

>On 5/24/2015 10:12 PM, graham wrote:
>> On 24/05/2015 7:55 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>> "graham" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 24/05/2015 4:51 PM, sf wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 24 May 2015 18:30:57 -0400, Dave Smith
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015-05-24 2:23 PM, graham wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You shut CA down, you shoot the rest of the country in the foot
>>>>>>>> since CA
>>>>>>>> supplies a whole lot of food for the rest of the country. Yes, I can
>>>>>>>> imagine it, they are asking people to take military type showers
>>>>>>>> already, no more than 5 minutes start to finish, get wet, soap up,
>>>>>>>> rinse
>>>>>>>> off.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheri
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5 minutes is generous. I can shower in 3!
>>>>>>> Save water - Shower with a friend!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even three is luxurious. I can do it in less than a minute. It
>>>>>> helps to
>>>>>> have a hand held shower so you don't get a blast of cold water. I get
>>>>>> into the tub and turn the water on hot and use the cold water to wet
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> soap and get lather up as the water is warming up. By the time I have
>>>>>> hot water I am ready to rinse.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's pretty easy when you're bald and don't shave in the shower.
>>>>>
>>>> You DON'T need to shave your legs!
>>>> Graham
>>>
>>> You might be used to farm animals, but I prefer my legs shaved.
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>>
>> I can't understand the aversion N.American women have towards leg and
>> armpit hair. It must be the result of conditioning by admass!
>> Graham
>
>It could be conditioning, or maybe this is what women are accustomed to,
>most women grow very little body hair.

I tend to think it is conditioning for the most part.