"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 26 May 2015 23:08:01 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>> On 5/26/2015 3:16 PM, jinx the minx wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > And just how many non-working women here (or men for that matter) also
>> > got
>> > their houses for "free", since they are technically being paid for by
>> > their
>> > working spouse? At least one in particular comes to mind. This
>> > continuous
>> > rail against Jill is ridiculous considering there are likely many here
>> > in
>> > RFC that are part of a single earner household.
>> >
>>
>> My wife has been a stay-at-home mom for the past 49 years raising two
>> kids and taking care of the house. I don't think she got "free"
>> housing. Looking forward to some of the replies you get.
>
> I hope you realized that jinx is talking about the attitude certain
> people have about what constitutes "free" and she agrees that stay at
> home wives are not sponging off their husbands (granted, nothing is
> absolute). Just reminding you that in this modern day and age, the
> stay at home "wife" can also be the male half of a mixed sex marriage
> (let's say it's a given in a same six marriage).

So you speak for her now?