On 6/27/2015 2:17 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:44:51 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:08:45 -0600, La Mirada > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/26/2015 5:28 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:23:06 -0600, La Mirada > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/26/2015 5:14 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:07:19 -0600, La Mirada > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/26/2015 5:00 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:29:12 -0600, La Mirada >
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2015 8:15 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:07:54 -0400, Dave Smith
>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-06-25 20:22, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At least 12 dislikes in two days. More than I could manage in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> several
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifetimes. This is way beyond reasonable or normal. No, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> care less if you object to this post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have someone in your household who you can talk to about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsession? I think it's becoming rather urgent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think his obsession with knocking Julie is any different
>>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>> the compulsion to defend her demonstrated by you and the rest of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> sisterhood of stupidity.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 99% of the time you and Jebus are at it again, I don't say
>>>>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>>>>> That has to do with having a life. Try it one day.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I caught YOU doing it too., hypocrite.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Poor soul"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You ass.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We've been through this. I wasn't talking about Julie.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I posted the direct quotation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who is it you believe you were referring to?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To women who'll have a chummy chat with a misbehaving troll just
>>>>>>> because he's nice to _them_.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that truly was your intent, as opposed to demeaning Julie, you get
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> apology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I resurrect the post will that really be how it went?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's still available you know.
>>>>>
>>>>> We've done that. You dug up the post, misinterpreted it and stuck to
>>>>> your guns.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I misrepresented nothing.
>>>>
>>>> It went down thusly:
>>>>
>>>>>> The kind of women who live with abusive men IRL and daren't cross
>>>>>> >>him.
>>>>>
>>>>> And then they come here and all attention is good attention. The poor
>>>>> souls.
>>>>
>>>> Feel free to revise yourself if think you can.
>>>
>>> That wasn't about Julie, but if you want to think it was, go right
>>> ahead.
>>
>> FWIW, I never thought it was about me. I never thought it was about anyone
>> specific though either.
>
> True. It wasn't about one specific person and it wasn't about you at
> all. He's going in circles, chasing his own tail.
>


You responded affirmatively to a slight that was SPECIFICALLY about her.

You're a lying rat ******* to deny what you did.

A consummate phony.