On Saturday, June 27, 2015 at 10:18:55 PM UTC-5, La Mirada wrote:
> On 6/27/2015 8:50 PM, Bryan-TGWWW wrote:
> > On Saturday, June 27, 2015 at 5:06:33 PM UTC-5, La Mirada wrote:
> >> On 6/27/2015 3:15 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> >>> On 6/27/2015 10:25 AM, La Mirada wrote:
> >>>> On 6/27/2015 1:53 PM, wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 1994 at 6:26:12 AM UTC+3, Stephen R. Perkins
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> I ought to invest in fire insurance right away and assure everyone
> >>>>>> that I
> >>>>>> (at present) have no intentions whatsoever of eating anyone's Snoopy or
> >>>>>> Benji or Muffy, or of actually chowing down on a mutt at all. I am
> >>>>>> curious,
> >>>>>> however, about whether it would be legal to do so or not.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I guess what raises my curiosity is wondering about how immigrants from
> >>>>>> certain eastern cultures, that freely eat such animals, have to adapt
> >>>>>> their
> >>>>>> lifestyles or dietary habits. Are they legally prohibited from
> >>>>>> eating dogs
> >>>>>> (or rats or anything else very un-American) in the US?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not morbid, just curious, (OK, maybe a LITTLE morbid...)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Steve Perkins
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ching chong ping pong
> >>>>>
> >>>> http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/...es-101714.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.thenewsnerd.com/local/ame...ling-dog-meat/
> >>>>
> >>>> A Los Angeles restaurant has been granted permission to consume and sell
> >>>> dog meat. A Filipino group successfully argued that the banning of the
> >>>> consumption of dog meat violated their religious rights.
> >>>>
> >>>> Puchow de Manila Eatery and Fine Dining has been granted provisional
> >>>> permission to sell and consume dog meat, while the Supreme Court decides
> >>>> if their case has merit. The restaurant is allowed to slaughter up to 3
> >>>> dogs per day, with the stipulation that they must be put down humanely.
> >>>> The World Animal Protection agency called the decision "shocking," and
> >>>> vowed to fight tooth and nail to ensure this act is not allowed to
> >>>> continue.
> >>>
> >>> I don't have any problems with people eating dogs, the question is what
> >>> is meant by humanely killing them. Do we break their necks like a
> >>> chicken or shoot them between the eyes like a cow, or stick them with a
> >>> knife like a pig? Do we give them lethal injections? What's the best way
> >>> to kill a dog for food?
> >>
> >> It sure raises some issues.
> >>
> >> Cattle typically get it with a stun gun and are bled out.
> >>
> >> Chickens tend to be electrocuted.
> >>
> >> I'd sooner eat my boot than kill a dog.
> >>
> > I think that many Americans would be uncomfortable with dogs being raised for
> > meat, but the fact is, many unwanted dogs are killed because no one wants them.
>
> This is true, sadly.
>
> > I don't see any point in forbidding persons from eating *those* dogs.
>
> I guess I generally do not either.
>
> I just think it's a tragedy to see them killed.
>
> My .02c.
>
The tragedy is caused by folks not spaying/neutering their pets.
>
> >>
> > --Bryan

--Bryan