|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|
|
Craig Wollam
dsi1 > wrote:
> On Saturday, July 4, 2015 at 1:30:34 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2015 16:28:25 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, July 4, 2015 at 1:03:48 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2015 15:46:44 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, July 4, 2015 at 7:17:23 AM UTC-10, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/4/2015 9:51 AM, wrote:
>>>>>>> You noticed that, too. Don't you just love these
>>>>>>> 20+ year old threads that have been resurrected?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's Google Groups for ya. The very thing dsi1 thinks should be the
>>>>>> "future" of Usenet. LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>
>>>>> I never said that Google Groups should be anything. Any idiot that's
>>>>> not blind to what's going on around him would see that the world is
>>>>> moving away from desktop computing and onto mobile devices and Google
>>>>> OSes. We're moving away from using desktop client programs like Forte
>>>>> Agent and Microsoft Office and towards web-based programs. If you're such a
>>>>> smartypants, you tell me how I'm suppose to post to Usenet on a Chromebook?
>>>>
>>>> You're right about mobility and about using multiple devices. But
>>>> that's no reason to make a bad web-based newsreader like GG. It
>>>> wouldn't have been very hard for them to make a decent one.
>>>>
>>>> But you know so little about Usenet, that you can't see how bad GG is.
>>>> And you won't accept anything from anybody.
>>>>
>>> If you're such a smartypants, you tell me how I'm suppose to post to
>>> Usenet on a Chromebook?
>>
>> If I had to, I'd rather wait until I had access to any normal news
>> reader.
>>
>> --
>> Bruce
>
> I have no problems with the choices you make. That doesn't help me at all.
Oddly enough, you have the same range of choices. I looked at the
limitations of net books, bought an iPad instead.
--
Xeno
|