On 2015-07-22 03:59:23 +0000, Dr. Edward Morbius said:

>>>> Yeah, if America could get rid of our Christian equivalent ("preachers")
>>>> might get some legitimacy too.
>>>
>>> Do our preachers run the political process?
>>>
>>> Um, no they don't.
>>
>> Depends on what you consider "political process";
>
> That's just semantics laden obfuscation.

Not it's not.

> You know as well as I do that religion does NOT institutionalize itself
> in our democratic republic.

Narrowing "political process" down to the institutionalization of the
Christian religion within the governmental mechanism is a peculiarly
narrow definition of "the political process", but sure, that would
imply that Christianity has no involvement with the government. I was
using the phrase the way it's normally used. What does your use of the
word "mullahs" mean?

>> I find that political
>> block, evangelicals,certainly do have significant effects on what kind
>> of blabber and posturing politicians produce to get their votes and
>> support. I call that the political process.
>
> You think "evangelicals" are in charge?

If I had thought so, I would have said so. Are you saying that
evangelicals have no control over regional senators and congress
persons?

> Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Monday Israel has no
> roots in the Middle East and would be "eliminated," ignoring a U.N.
> warning to avoid incendiary rhetoric ahead of the annual General
> Assembly session.

Yeah we know all about that. But all you have to do to find fascist
"christians" is turn on the radio.

> Case closed.

I think your case was that your opinions are correct. And yes it seems
quite closed.

>>> So then WTF is your major mental malfunction?
>>
>> Going personal so soon?
>
> No time better than the present.

Welcome to the killfile.