On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:35:02 -0600, Janet B >
wrote:
>On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 20:09:32 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"S Viemeister" > wrote in message
...
>>> On 8/1/2015 2:11 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 17:29:53 +0100, Janet > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article >, says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>> Really? Interesting. I always though worldwide was:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - herb the spice was pronounced erb
>>>>>>>> - herb the name was pronounced herb.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Brits don't prescribe to that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those barbarians! ;-D
>>>>>
>>>>> At least we know how not to use "prescribe "
>>>>>
>>>>> Janet UK
>>>> perhaps 'ascribe'?
>>>>
>>> Subscribe.
>>
>>data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68dd/e68ddc8ac511f8bf72cf18574fec7aa4b5673560" alt="Smile"
>I don't know. Look back at the original statement. I am unsure of
>ascribe vs. subscribe.
IMO it should be 'ascribe'. 'Subscribe' doesnt quite work as well in
that context.