On 2015-08-02 6:05 PM, S Viemeister wrote:
> On 8/2/2015 5:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> I have been exposed to enough Americanese to question the use of
>> "prescribe to" when "subscribe to" would have been more appropriate.
>>
>
> Possibly a simple typo.
> 'Prescribe' without the 'to' would have been fine, as would 'subscribe to'.
>
Yep. I pointed that out in another post. That would have meant that they
have a rule about it. The other would mean than they follow that rule.