dsi1 wrote:

>> Fascinating that you allude to it being a weather modification experiment.
>>
>> The Canucks have been all over this for a while now:
>>
>> http://www.globalresearch.ca/haarp-s...-warfare/20407
>>
>> Others go so far as to claim that HAARP can and has been used for
>> weather modification, to cause earthquakes and tsunamis, to disrupt
>> global communications systems, and more.
>>
>> Major aspects of the program are kept secret for alleged reasons of
>> "national security." Yet there is no doubt that HAARP and
>> electromagnetic weapons capable of being used in warfare do exist.
>> According to the official HAARP website, "HAARP is a scientific endeavor
>> aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with
>> particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance
>> communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense
>> purposes." The ionosphere is the delicate upper layer of our atmosphere
>> which ranges from about 30 miles (50 km) to 600 miles (1,000 km) above
>> the surface of the Earth.
>>
>> The HAARP website acknowledges that experiments are conducted which use
>> electromagnetic frequencies to fire pulsed, directed energy beams in
>> order to "temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere." Some
>> scientists state that purposefully disturbing this sensitive layer could
>> have major and even disastrous consequences. Concerned HAARP researchers
>> like Dr. Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa and Alaska's
>> Dr. Nick Begich (son of a US Congressman) present evidence suggesting
>> that these disturbances can even cause tsunamis and earthquakes.
>
> Let's face it - if you shoot some high energy beams into the ionosphere, you're gonna find out things.

Cool things, scarey things, fun things!

> You might even be able to use it as a defensive or offensive weapon.

The prevalent theory was that Cheney used it to settle a score on New
Orleans.

Maybe he was treated poorly there, who can say....


> I doubt one would be able to control the weather though.

But we already do, cloud seeding in the western states is the big thing now:

https://www.hcn.org/articles/a-new-w...-seeding-study

If only clouds could be more efficient in bringing us rain, our water
supply woes might be lessened. Scientists have been working on how to
modify the natural process of precipitation since 1946, when chemist
Bernard Vonnegut (brother of Kurt Vonnegut) declared that injecting
clouds with silver iodide could change how they behave.

Since then, most Western states have tried cloud seeding at some point,
in the hopes of giving watersheds, farms and even ski resorts a boost.
And yet, there’s never really been a consensus in the scientific
community about how well cloud seeding truly works.

But last week, the 16-page summary of a long-awaited study that aims to
quantify the impact of cloud seeding was released, renewing debate about
whether the practice can in fact bring more rain and snow. The research
is a product of the $13-million-dollar Wyoming Weather Modification
Pilot Project to study snowfall over six winters in southern Wyoming,
and may be the most extensive study of cloud seeding yet.

The report suggests that, during ideal conditions, a seeded cloud will
produce between 5 to 15 percent more precipitation. The practice is a
viable way to augment existing water supplies, researchers say. They
also found that cloud seeding has a negligible environmental impact and
can be cost effective.

> That's too much like a scenario for a cheesy spy flick from the last 50 years.

Like that old Sandra Bullock fave, "The Net"?