View Single Post
  #123 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Arthur Rochford Manby Arthur Rochford Manby is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default Jacque Pepin - New Cooking Show

On 9/8/2015 9:18 AM, Je�us wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Sep 2015 17:55:00 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
>> Je_us wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2015 22:47:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Je_us wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2015 21:25:42 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/6/2015 3:43 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2015 13:51:29 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Truth is the ingredients the navy receives are far better
>>>>> quality than >>>> any used by civilians,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL, you're losing your marbles.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The 4F douchebag draft dodger never wore the uniform.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, that makes so much sense...
>>>>>
>>>>> So, you still stand by this claim of yours?
>>>>> "Truth is the ingredients the navy receives are far better quality
>>>>> than any used by civilians"
>>>>>
>>>>> On the face of it, that is a ridiculous claim, and nobody needs any
>>>>> military service anywhere to know that.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. There was a time when that happened, but it was all services
>>>> and it was WWII. Not after that.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I still have trouble believing that. Did high end restaurants
>>> close down during that time?

>>
>> Many of the better foods were reserved for the military effort in WWII
>> althouth there was plenty left for the rest.

>
> That's what I figured
>
>> Butter was rationed for
>> example.
>>
>> http://www.history.com/news/hungry-h...in-wartime-ame
>> rica
>>
>> It was far tougher in England.

>
> Certainly was.
>

Mmmm hmmm...

Ayup...