On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:14:18 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>That raises interesting questions (or would do if it happened here).
>Is a driverless car obliged to stop if asked to do so by a police
>officer in uniform; and, who can be prosecuted if it doesn't?"

The interesting questions that driverless cars raise are legion. For
example imagine, in order to take evasive action in an emergency, a
driverless car has to choose between plowing into a lampost, an
oncoming car, a store front, a little old lady crossing the street,
two minority group kids standing by the curb, one non-minority group
kid standing by the curb, etc etc etc. Which does it go for? Or does
it just stop dead in its tracks and get crushed by the out-of-control
dump track immediately behind it?

Driverless cars are Stupid Technology.

--
Anne's Little Brother Bob
St Francis would have done better to preach to the cats.

--
Bob
A shack on Sungoo
www.kanyak.com